RSS

Monthly Archives: December 2010

Dr. H Takes A Look At The Brando Classic: On The Waterfront.

Whenever I heard a performance being hailed as electrifying, I would regard it as the usual critics hyperbole, a poverty of expression.  An extravagance bestowed upon an artist seemed unworthy, ignoring the higher skill of the directors who are real artists.

Once you have seen On the Waterfront, you’ll immerse yourself in the small world of a small time ex-prize fighter, Miki Malone, played by Marlon Brando with such finesse that I promise you will never doubt a performance could underwhelm a director’s craft and in this case a well-respected Elia Kazan.

On the Waterfront needs to be viewed through the historical prism, it is a product of its time that we would rather forget: the early 1950’s the age of McCarthyism.  A time when any perceived criticism of the status quo, any distrust of the system or even complaining about corruption was seen as sympathizing with Communists.

The simple story about a dockyard union boss and his corrupt minions was seen by McCarthy as a metaphor for American business and Malone the honest guy who stood up against him became synonymous with radical purpose.  Both Kazan and Brando had to appear before McCarthy’s commission to clear their names and Kazan even had to go so far as to rat on several of his colleagues in order to save himself.

Nonetheless Brando’s performance lives on.  It’s a simple story of two brothers Mallone the simpleton who gave up a shot at the title, “taking a dive” in a fight on orders from the mob that controlled the New Jersey docks.  His brother is the crooked attorney who is on the union’s payroll and a priest trying to organize a peaceful revolt.

The Heroine, “Edie”’s brother is killed by the mob after Mallone unknowingly helps them by calling him out of his house.

The two excellent and probably most famous dramatic scenes are shown here.

The first is where Brando describes to Edie the circumstances of her brother’s death.  The conversation is drowned out by an approaching train.  That is classic Kazan—a director’s genius at work. 

The second involves the famous conversation between Brando and his brother in the back seat of a car where Brando famously declares “I could have been a contender.”

If you want to see a masterpiece, watch this one, you will not regret it.

 
7 Comments

Posted by on December 27, 2010 in Movie Reviews

 

We’re extending the JPFmovie Give Away until the end of the year!

I’ve heard from many of you that the deadline passed too quickly for you to do anything about the JPFmovie give away. Well I have heard you cries of pain and am extending the deadline until the end of the year. So take your time and I look forward to your responses.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 21, 2010 in Movie Reviews

 

Princessofpaperclips gets all pissed off about The Millionairess.

Fragments of a Self

A Review of Anthony Asquith’s Film The Millionairess

The stereotypes of women in this film are more dominant than its plot. The Millionairess, based on George Bernard Shaw’s play, starred Sophia Loren and Peter Sellers, and was released in Britain in 1960. Packed into a mere ninety minutes, Epifinia the protagonist appears in a variety of ubiquitous female roles: an object, a child, the wild woman, and an emotional, irrational wreck. At best, she is difficult to take seriously; at worse she is a capable woman, trying desperately to mask her intelligence. Kabir (Sellers) is largely a foil character, as the film largely revolves around Epifinia’s internal struggles.

“Long live the Millionairess” …Immediately we realize possessions define Epifinia, rather than defining her by character or accomplishments. Her identity depends upon her wealth; not even money she earned, but that bequeath to her by a man. At the reading of her father’s will, she is told her inheritance is contingent upon her obedience to his wishes. Even after his death, he has power over her.

The first glimpse we get into the erratic life of Epifania is outside of her apartment. The door ajar, Epifinia and Alastair, her husband, argue. He shouts she must “obey” him, because “I am your husband”.  Epifania resists dominance by throwing him out, followed by a plate, which barely misses his head. The room is trashed.  Her hair is in disarray, her dress is ripped nearly exposing her breast. The front of her skirt is torn, inches short of revealing her crotch. This creates a link between resisting male authority and hyper sexuality. In Sagamore’s office, she crawls across the floor like an animal with a broken chair leg in her fist, reinforcing this. There is a deliberate connection between her animalistic behavior and resistance to the dominant paradigm.
Portraits of her father and husband loom over Epifinia in the foyer. A voice echoes from the painting admonishing her for “disobeying me”. She kneels subserviently in front of the painting. Epifinia begs the painting for advice- insecure about her ability to make her own decisions, wanting someone to take care of her, as if she were a child. Her choice of clothing is bright, childlike, and ridiculous, making it impossible to view her as an adult and not as a decorative object.

Kabir pulls Epifania out of the river, bringing her to a fish smokers to change into dry clothes. She seeks attention, initially throwing her dress and later her undergarments at him, visibly frustrated when he ignores her. She tries to seduce him by feigning illness, insisting he check her pulse, shoulder and back while she removes more and more of her loosely draped coat. Throughout the film she attempts to use her sexuality to gain attention.

Occasionally, Epifania surprises the viewer by acting out of character. Her anger is aroused when the psychologist insults her father. She throws him to the ground and in the river. In addition to physical strength, she is also quite intelligent, spearheading an operation to build a clinic in Calcutta. When she takes on Kabir’s challenge to work for three months, she is analytic, pragmatic, and clear headed. If she is able to demonstrate this level of competency and clarity, we assume she is playing the ditz the remainder of the film. Sadly, we later learn that her motivation in building the clinic was to entice Kabir, hoping to gain his approval and increased physical proximity. Her business savvy at the pasta shop grows from a desire to win the affections of Kabir. None of this is prompted by an interest to create, strive, or succeed on her terms. The only time she makes a decision that addresses her own needs, is after Kabir rejects her. At that point she decides to establish a deliberate community of women, to will live out her days away from men.

It is interesting that Shaw inserts a character like Kabir as the object of Epifinia’s desire. He is selfless, altruistic and sincere in his role as humanitarian doctor. He ignores Epifinia’s coquettish behavior, scolding her for wasting his time. Kabir states her “sickness is beyond my skills”, calling her an “imaginary invalid” when she plays sick to gain attention.  He states his worldview as “being, not having”, telling Epifinia “power must come from within”, rather than from the possession of money and objects.
During the denouement, Kabir is told that Epifinia “will withdraw from the world at midnight”, which he interprets as an allusion to suicide. He swiftly enters, as Epifinia is ready to depart for her hermitage.  Kabir attempts to stop what he perceives as a suicide attempt, when she is really leaping into a boat from a ledge. At the last moment, Kabir proclaims his love for Epifinia and then they dance off…living “happily ever after”. Which is hard to believe, based on the storyline up until this point. I would find it hard for a man with Kabir’s values and sense of self to resign himself to the lack of such in Epifinia.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 17, 2010 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Xmas JPFMovies next big giveaway!

That is right viewers and fans of JPFmovies, we are going to have another DVD give away extravaganza! This time it is you the viewer who will do the reviewing. I have picked three movies and who ever writes the best review for anyone of the three (or any combination of the three) will win two, that is right two, dvd’s (including blue-ray’s) of their choice per movie (6 total). The movies you can review are:

Peter Sellers in the Millionairess

Marlon Brando in On the Waterfront

The Three Outlaw Samurai

If you do not have any of the movies, please let me know and I will get it to you electronically.

If you are the only one who reviews a movie then you win automatically. Otherwise we will judge which review is the best for the prize. Remember a total of 6 movies are going to be given away and the deadline is Monday, December 20th, 2010.

 
3 Comments

Posted by on December 13, 2010 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Yes We Look At Another Peter Sellers Masterpiece: The Party (1968)

Sellers plays an Indian film actor who somehow was signed up to do a lead part in a Hollywood production called Son of Gunga Din.  The Party (1968) opens as British Imperial forces c.1878 march through an Indian ravine; a wounded native deserter, Hrundi V. Bakshi (Sellers) climbs atop a ridge to bugle a charge. Since this is a set, the clumsy actor overdoes his role by not dying on cue.  Instead he keeps using his bugle again and again and again until his own compatriots turn on him and begin to fire to move the process along.  Later he ruins a shot where he kills an enemy guard by forgetting that he is still wearing his waterproof wristwatch even though the movie is set circa 1878.  Finally, he wrecks the one and only chance of filming the exploding fort with dynamite by tying his shoe on the detonator-plunger.

Sellers is then “blacklisted” by the studio head who mistakenly writes Hrundi V. Bakshi’s name on to the guest list of a dinner party he and his wife are throwing.  Sellers arrives at the party and quickly demonstrates the problems of inviting him.  His shoe is muddy so he tries to casually clean it off in a pool where the clean water rapidly turns black but the shoe floats away.  Using a tree to fish it out, the shoe ends up on a tray of canapés being served to the guests.

In the meantime the problems multiply during dinner when Sellers, the host and guests have to deal with a drunken waiter who serves Caesar salad using his bare hand instead of a utensil.  During the main course, Bakshi’s roast Cornish game hen accidentally catapults off his fork and becomes impaled on a guest’s tiara. He asks the drunken waiter to retrieve his meal and the drunk man complies, unaware that the woman’s wig has come off along with her tiara, as she obliviously engages in conversation.

Bakshi innocently creates more havoc through many awkward encounters with inanimate objects: the house’s bizarre electronic panel is a too-tempting toy causing various appliance to turn on and off as well as broadcasting his voice throughout the house and feeding the parrot with spilling seeds is best recalled with the catch-phrase “Birdie num-num.” Sellers is clearly a fish out of water as he tries to laugh at jokes, not hearing them completely but laughing anyway, or laughing at anecdotes that aren’t funny.  Everyone present compounds the evening’s disorder. The Party soon becomes a gaggle of career-hungry Hollywood fools preying on one another.

Edwards said the 63 page script for the Party was the shortest he ever worked with.  Normally this might be a sign that you are in for a  moronic movie (my guess is that many of today’s “blockbuster” action moviemakers would consider a 63 page script too long), but that is not the case.  The Party is a brilliant and outrageously funny movie that you should see without delay.

 
3 Comments

Posted by on December 9, 2010 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
%d bloggers like this: